Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue

Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net> Thu, 01 July 2010 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lr@lukasrosenstock.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14C73A6802 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.372, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAumlK+td2XR for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5503A67D7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so373471vws.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.214.195 with SMTP id hb3mr5869553qcb.292.1277966500033; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.236.130 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C2E7@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:41:39 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTilj97ppfsqp6ZzxLJhURLhnmSx9P39-A97OuGAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lukas Rosenstock <lr@lukasrosenstock.net>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Underscore, dash, green, blue
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:41:34 -0000

3 except headers.

2010/7/1 Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>:
> First, sorry about this. J
>
>
>
> I do my best not to ask the group this kind of questions and just pick
> something on my own, but I can’t decide so I’ll run a quick vote (yes, a
> VOTE – I can’t imagine seeking a consensus call on this).
>
>
>
> -09 uses underscores for parameter names (except for in the headers) and
> dashes for parameter values. This seems like an odd selection. Before, it
> used dashes for header parameter names, and underscore everywhere else. Not
> great either.
>
>
>
> So…
>
>
>
> The changes my OCD can live with:
>
>
>
> 1. Use dashes throughout
>
> 2. Use underscores for all parameter names (headers included), dashes for
> all values
>
> 3. Use underscores throughout
>
>
>
> I want to get this done with in a day because people are writing code for
> -09 and I’d like to stop making changes beyond editorial.  I just think that
> having different styles between the endpoint parameters and header
> parameters is broken.
>
>
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>



-- 
http://lukasrosenstock.net/