[OAUTH-WG] Assertion Drafts: Review by **19th May 2013**
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 05 May 2013 09:41 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E0F21F905B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZYYi2ZwEigD for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A9F21F8FAC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.20]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LgsnI-1UBP9537Zu-00oDbq for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 May 2013 11:41:29 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 May 2013 09:41:29 -0000
Received: from a88-115-219-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.200]) [88.115.219.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 May 2013 11:41:29 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/VqatifPTVeVmDMnfrIx2C4UWSe9edPWJ2QCy/zR YKzuaF6cskCHO6
Message-ID: <51862946.8080302@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:41:26 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Drafts: Review by **19th May 2013**
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 09:41:35 -0000
Hi all after the IESG feedback on the assertion framework it was sent back to the working group and the document authors have updated the draft (and the SAML assertion document as well). We need to get the documents back to the IESG and I would like to ask you to review the documents by the **19th May 2013**. - Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions/ - SAML 2.0 Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer/ Ciao Hannes
- [OAUTH-WG] Assertion Drafts: Review by **19th May… Hannes Tschofenig