Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is an Open Redirect
Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Mon, 26 July 2010 17:29 UTC
Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81C3A6883 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.362, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Syly0RkHalvy for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083403A67E3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.5]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o6QHUIb2023330 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:30:18 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1280165418; bh=G5A63QWdP6CU9YlDePLhp4mbnlc=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZYb/6JOjAfR9GYYv9F2gPx7ue89UR0yTlfZUkQvas7DUU7y5e0KQ26DVuKu3Af5Xp wc5/aw2znJ32kTo/VAN9A==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=Cl8uojhtL9EpFQGrvF0O1DMpPq+Qh9BjoxlNXA5c2faWMYdkOWgFtqXpppvejfjdG fTnU0123ddAqy8UEtvrFw==
Received: from gwb20 (gwb20.prod.google.com [10.200.2.20]) by hpaq5.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o6QHSkCF017926 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:30:17 -0700
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so152816gwb.19 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.31.7 with SMTP id e7mr8116160ane.58.1280165416195; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.33.1 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D24C564ACEAD16459EF2526E1D7D605D0D3C09F593@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
References: <AANLkTimstdtTJLjPF3v3RHd-=ma6irCuUgGiULiGhW4H@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinQpAgV8KBEWFtrTB1UgiVs1dnTwVPdL-cScnx6@mail.gmail.com> <D0061622-4DEB-4374-BF67-F3F45F9951B3@facebook.com> <D24C564ACEAD16459EF2526E1D7D605D0D3C09F593@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:29:56 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=xa6L8UE2wUOr73wDBMe1hQa9XAcFpTbefffca@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Richer, Justin P." <jricher@mitre.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is an Open Redirect
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:29:59 -0000
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Richer, Justin P. <jricher@mitre.org> wrote: > And this is even a bigger potential problem when you combine it with unregistered or dynamically-registered clients, which we know some instances are going to support. In these cases, though, it's hard to trust *any* URL that the client is asking for, even for valid responses. The user must approve a valid response, so it should not work as a redirector. Right? An immediate mode will only work if the user explicitly approved at least once in the past. Marius
- [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is an … Michael D Adams
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is… Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is… Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is… Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] End-User Authorization Endpoint is… Luke Shepard