IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?

Ivan Pulleyn <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com> Thu, 15 July 2010 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BA93A690F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNLwBOVUjyKI for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20EB3A6872 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so105232gxk.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hnWupiAwRuf5XucjTIMhjZBojrmUCPDK+yjYpcBjxUU=; b=VsYFy60IzDA1qGonWmpru+1afsHUOlXRqrRFd4d5dXuEExjMtFzBbGGX2AASYwci71 l7p+UoPEpGqWTTpRjf7i/qyG0W91pVrpTidp5CAAfLFoQqfjiUh6QxD7Di7d0SjFGzTj yvruCZkkFf9u3UzyWKXkyB8zGHeXrCHP97LY4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mLx3KfDu4+UN8xx0wUeQ/PHmeEuxpwzwGk1TZ3F3+KrCI80NLpu4yfwL39bnrcoWNJ bDJZvM8Ms6wDuggGvHMYElcBaNqcUqyWF+goL5/EfetwmEWgZVkEjl31fUXth119s3gM yo+P0NXLKFIacZZgK+kxkP6RAjhzgT/n7RnsI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.240.16 with SMTP id n16mr9329090ybh.316.1279173299387; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.95.19 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6345F9F9-2EDD-4199-9C90-339CB1757B0A@lodderstedt.net>
References: <4C3E389D.5080300@lodderstedt.net> <AANLkTilbBWMoMj5DIJ7IMYzlBGgZHni7xCYHyAzz_XK4@mail.gmail.com> <95C3FB14-F5C4-4ECB-91EF-9ED988C367DE@hueniverse.com> <6345F9F9-2EDD-4199-9C90-339CB1757B0A@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:54:59 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinipZXpkw-FeksCQxJYS4NFetu0KFHCSRJ5mmoa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Pulleyn <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com>
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd23e081dbe28048b66beaa"
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:54:53 -0000

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt <
torsten@lodderstedt.net> wrote:

> Did I get you right? Your answer is: Oauth is not suited for deployments
> with different resource servers which rely in a single authz server?
>
> I don't know why you categorize this as  "complex". Is it so unusual to
> have let's say mail, webstorage, telephony, and payment services?
>
> At Deutsche Telekom, we operate such a deployment (with much more different
> resource servers) and I had hoped to move our token service towards OAuth
> v2.
>
> So would you recommend me zo stick to our proprietary protocol?
>
>
I'm confused why scope isn't sufficient for your needs.

Ivan...

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status