Re: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Tue, 10 March 2009 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279843A6917 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0Vfsk+WSphA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B04A3A6A6A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9039 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2009 06:19:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.20) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 10 Mar 2009 06:19:39 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:19:39 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:19:59 -0700
Thread-Topic: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2
Thread-Index: AcmhEhfYzVUcOjReTn2UlDmONQfYhwALDYTwAAIZoZAAAFu4YA==
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723425023C6EF6@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723425023C6EEB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E111F985B512@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E111F985B512@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oauth bof discussion <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:19:06 -0000

A bug. Thanks! I'll fix it (in a few weeks when the freeze is over).

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Manger, James H
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:14 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2
> 
> Why is "c%40" sorted after "c2"?
> "c@" sorts after "c2", but §3.3.1.2. "Normalize Request Parameters"
> encodes names at step 1 before sorting at step 2.
> 
> James Manger
> James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com
> Identity and security team — Chief Technology Office — Telstra
> 
> ----------
> From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:45 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action:draft-hammer-oauth-01.txt
> 
> 	Title           : The OAuth Core Protocol
> 	Date            : 2009-03-09
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-oauth-01.txt
> _______________________________________________
> oauth mailing list
> oauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth