Archive

[OAUTH-WG] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 24 January 2018 15:10 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-discovery@ietf.org, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, oauth@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151680660708.25636.17780888001111231130.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 07:10:07 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/DrOjOtpQ3NmxDnE-kzCLY0vvcqA>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Adam's DISCUSS.

And as the Gen-ART reviewer pointed out, I find it a bit troubling that the
shepherd write-up answers to the questions about IANA registrations are
completely wrong.

[OAUTH-WG] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Alissa Cooper