[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (5379)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 June 2018 04:08 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0053130E21 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HTZWbkKKn-s for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F33130DDA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E090CB81D9E; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 21:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: dick.hardt@gmail.com, kaduk@mit.edu, ekr@rtfm.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, rifaat.ietf@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: james.h.manger@team.telstra.com, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180606040756.E090CB81D9E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 21:07:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/E_HbX37tMfBKhA9mVcOau5RxFhY>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (5379)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 04:08:30 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5379 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: James Manger <james.h.manger@team.telstra.com> Section: 5.1, 4.2.2 Original Text ------------- expires_in RECOMMENDED. The lifetime in seconds of the access token. For example, the value "3600" denotes ... Corrected Text -------------- expires_in RECOMMENDED. The lifetime in seconds of the access token. For example, the value 3600 denotes ... Notes ----- The "expires_in" member in JSON must be a numeric value, not a string. Unfortunately quite a few implementations have got this wrong. A likely reason is the quoted value "3600" in the RFC where "expires_in" is defined. The quotes in the text version of the RFC are only an artefact of the marked-up as a protocol value in the RFC production chain. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (5… RFC Errata System