Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-spop naming

Bill Mills <> Wed, 12 November 2014 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C32A1A8F4B for <>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:15:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.693
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HuqYEOIuPC3C for <>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9385D1A9174 for <>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:11:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=s2048; t=1415812305; bh=0fuehYZWo1YO7eHSg+lJv8kUxQ04kw8BOz5BmhFnmhw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=sdWUbQioRq1VgV11haSmgd2xrqCo5uCPs+PXjU883hIqAHduoYWir4gdt/jH3xVcA7NVqYa7B4EMZdCo8SXBybU7BeYHlmsDdkwXNMIIlE0sNLcmXFtbA1eGsGR8FQGTV/WwT+3W8/daoReyg26iN5QbREh4iFU3DlthVw0hwfwbmWIiurYU0JQj17kb0TFLTccOnxumtTvFy4Ey2gk1x0pfvK4zwwrGH+A7fxEciZkMbBWHucMYelHvbTLgZkqXJPYxO7D6ScVB5MopicRNepsD7RBzZG1pXI3DS8uHAtJkrJtpJJakd7hSG39O/MHN1MGEZiZ4VjRYP196F6D+uQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s2048;; b=paqrOp8uw+YKZuJtKswPETSHjeKtEWr/aLM2Cux4Vl4uakxHr3naRQbHKkwgHsCtomo4Dt20wrTuSbN68AAQgf7HY9qAGb8ysb/z2fnAk/p+Q8ZGUjBfVg25ajwI7BVHMncMGVhd27OloSfDajBk31gbf6vu9A3ziuzuGbBjZt+Sdx/9hN/3MkozpJ6WilhOgHb1nlHTFJhbsy2b6uZiN6dCtEyuZaIF5f8j5AAxU1SJkKmBwN8zgq/kjR1h9+j9dAem7uj1G2OSf81Z1ePYwKfdssRAOul5Ub8vxWhyHUGmqAwY6ao5eIx/0qoXtDtX00jDBZrIy5QSh0JajS/QeQ==;
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2014 17:11:45 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2014 17:11:45 -0000
Received: from [] by with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2014 17:11:45 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: taNWTxAVM1m50pHhLvILtA1lhy2mQ4UKJt5s_prqYCUFTsY56uV06q0OoCbH8Y6 rdIxbGo.LTrPeS7fBxyWIDV_48S.CYAZvqwLl9GPlT0r08Zb_oTpZ2a2xbf9_vZ023XXsW3HxQux yUmmmd5KWnSvJYnMB0ggPqqW94tMErgvB4IW5hDvxqBusK8QovR7N496diiMQikHCo0NotUYHBRp 4bLk514_L3_HQbTU_TSsl2h14Ma60RHNlUBreuKT6_3cUWzc3ArieIJ3tAV66t5OvXy7ZIfqIQvd lpXdwZM6fA9AgtcvHR71mOtVZOgXfbYBGBZwhZkddF_4KuN6kIi2OfdPZtpI8dtsz0d4P6.KiNUK r5TPsHLe4eoYwFKNH1H2QSDrfiFroxiqrNut1fOqCO1ugj81tNgcnB2QAvK_bG9S2ShUtXLKSHzf ymDayX8t9dnrA31CygeSx8B23Mf6C3Fp5GjuTli_Z711pzGdKyi2HX31qiBseNrrY.fYk1lov
Received: by; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:11:45 +0000
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:11:44 +0000
From: Bill Mills <>
To: John Bradley <>, Brian Campbell <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_89111_1660284620.1415812304886"
Cc: OAuth WG <>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-spop naming
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Bill Mills <>
List-Id: OAUTH WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:15:56 -0000

I don't actually care if we change the document tracking name from ...-oauth-spop as long as we change the name of the thing in the text.  
Agreed doc name changing is annoying, it's survivable though.  Having done it once I'd do it differently if I had to do it again, submitting the last version of the original as -00 of the new name just before submitting a new set of changes to it as -01. 

     On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:02 AM, John Bradley <> wrote:

 The OAuth meeting is today.
We ran into the publication deadline for the IETF meeting during IIW so haven't published a update yet.
We do have text on defining error codes that we will discuss today. 
I expect the name discussion will also happen today.    Changing the draft name is annoying for document tracker continuity but doable.
John B.
On Nov 12, 2014, at 6:56 AM, Brian Campbell <> wrote:

I agree that changing the name could avoid a lot of unnecessary confusion (and said as much in Sept 

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Bill Mills <> wrote:

Any progress on naming on this thing?   Didn't see any reply to my previous comment, but that might have been because I replied to the -02 publication notice and it might have gotten filtered.
Similarly, the question of extending the error registry to allow the server tofeed back a failure if the server's required hash method isn't sent.  Also may need a way to advertise what hash method is required.
OAuth mailing list

OAuth mailing list