IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Implementing MAC bearer

Erlend Hamnaberg <ngarthl@gmail.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ngarthl@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E9021F864C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:53:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVU1jqWtIAQk for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4AB21F8613 for <OAuth@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbwd15 with SMTP id wd15so521544obb.31 for <OAuth@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:53:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VNb50MdqpvQPOV+l3NAZmiRukwWnWTJ47QzJQa4f2I8=; b=NIMoWybui1rXZBI8RRlIXAbCEyVckyeesUtxV8M+UXFXUEfd1l+tr/elTtutgNmmbP y/6ZNW7tTIdzXuHScfYQ0iOJjxlKBXHZEwN/OV+wCAHGv6gsqE5kqxdcdJ3VqzgMXaEi NaMQ+bPvM3vmKUsM+tFfYeVosOX4tlXzkxwWI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.182.69 with SMTP id ec5mr9674120obc.48.1328687604417; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.117.70 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:53:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1328642876.38180.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <CAKj3E3b7kok_uoKRWxNox8BPLgPqDYuvWu2sNSbi6y6j=sHs1g@mail.gmail.com> <1328642876.38180.YahooMailNeo@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:53:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKj3E3b=eNjeHd8bp1mwZmX9Jz4XekwzhqG_o40q1qASdXB8FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erlend Hamnaberg <ngarthl@gmail.com>
To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae939954fadc2df04b86f30d7"
Cc: "OAuth@ietf.org" <OAuth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Implementing MAC bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:53:25 -0000

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:27 PM, William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> You're asking about MAC tokens right?  The term "bearer" on this list
> usually refers to the Bearer Token draft style stuff.
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Erlend Hamnaberg <ngarthl@gmail.com>
> *To:* OAuth@ietf.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:02 AM
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Implementing MAC bearer
>
> Hi guys and gals.
>
> I am trying to implement the MAC bearer within a client library.
>
> Searching the Archive I find that the current draft version of the MAC
> bearer is incorrect.
>
> For instance the body-hash is no longer supported. Is there a new draft
> planned soon?
> For implementers there would be great help in more examples.
> That way we can write test cases which conforms to the spec more easily.
>
> Best regards
>
> Erlend
>

Yes, of course.

Sorry for the confusion.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-oauth-v2-mac-token-05

--
Erlend

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email