Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

[Phil Hunt <[e-mail]>]

Unfortunately I won't be at CIS. Should be lots of time to meet in vancouver and we can do a summary in the session if agenda permits. 

Phil

On 2012-07-15, at 10:59, John Bradley <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Good working with you and Tony is the stuff of dreams:)
> 
> We can sync up off list and try to reduce duplication.
> 
> Are we all at CIS this week?
> 
> John B.
> On 2012-07-15, at 11:47 AM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> 
>> Sounds like a great idea. I can put together a few slides. 
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> On 2012-07-15, at 7:59, John Bradley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
>>> 
>>> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
>>> 
>>> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating.
>>> 
>>> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
>>> 
>>> John B.
>>> 
>>> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our use cases and requirements
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>>>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>>>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; [e-mail] WG
>>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>>> 
>>>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
>>>> 
>>>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>>>> 
>>>>              -- Mike
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>>>> To: [e-mail] WG
>>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all, 
>>>> 
>>>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. 
>>>> 
>>>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear 
>>>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and 
>>>> * whether you want to present something. 
>>>> 
>>>> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>>>> 
>>>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the face-to-face meeting. 
>>>> 
>>>> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>>>> 
>>>> Ciao
>>>> Hannes
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>