[OAUTH-WG] Fwd: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer draft errors

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Forwarding this to the WG.

There is a word missing in the sentence noted below as well as in the
similar sentence in the SAML draft. However, I believe it should be "to the
client" rather than "about the client".

What is the most appropriate way to handle a minor fix like this at this
stage? A note to the RFC editor? Or should I push new drafts?

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-11#section-7
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-22#section-7



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benjamin Trofatter <[e-mail]>
Date: Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 8:11 PM
Subject: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer draft errors
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]


Hi,

I was reading your draft and noticed a couple of typos.  In 7 Privacy
paragraph 1, the last sentence reads:

"In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain
information the client, the JWT should be be encrypted to the authorization
server."

I'm guessing this ought to say something like:

"In cases where it is desirable to prevent disclosure of certain
information about the client, the JWT should be encrypted to the
authorization server."

Hope this helps,

Ben
*_______________________________________________*
 Ben Trofatter       //       Software Engineer         //       trofatter@g
oogle.com       //      [phone]