Re: [OAUTH-WG] errata id 4206

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14691A007A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:02:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R6ZvyHBG89SX for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 893241A0052 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgeb1 with SMTP id b1so25350387qge.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:01:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Y2jk0iDAz1WrBZRybRO46zihyFqrLQKTZjxwOdErnCM=; b=PLvO+iQUPc8qCII7VuBR/02Qvs6G6V7fx2jrKJnBHDhUUl1X8ZF1neSIzbuTi/U8HL nELqFFGRTkPL/I+Y6qtzwiQljcOR0LpBOB7+kZD9xrF4X8x4SzUPQEb91usC+UkPfjbx w1FEmp64ODJHEk85DKv+UUtYp1gku8/v1BdMLKdXNSrNFY6l9lJL2ykdfBjKOl5EvcgU Q0MNR5Ze0rU0+HpD6XhDRMmpU1zp9T6I7oABlwakwuqO6gKCIcpXOOvkrCduK8dsyp8W l6O+YiLGbF3j2jMkwDRA1/iYx5Zz8Zb+/77Nzv+KhZ8yd4xXuJ5FgL5tnimR6XgqgIBl KNtQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=Y2jk0iDAz1WrBZRybRO46zihyFqrLQKTZjxwOdErnCM=; b=PGK4oPrBmY47+fSBXih2T50VZEnbH0mKjWw38G93y6F4fmpnvirZn1W3NHDl/Vgrk7 Jq7bGBnxGuGuT104M6cIQY77RafJmvmVwCDG4VbKYGRdziVRpMI/WK+mftzYZGFtjZf1 WlIfeFalNmCowpmPD6fCd4g88OXFpYin3d9+GFq0++ey60gXFgzYlRaWit+hZHXo7BQQ J382RS4ihwLJU0bYI1XpLmgNeW4H2VLJxD9rwaM36fHNMlWZ3+UHmQLUzTLvJi3zIPEz RPeyPcG+PwltGZdgUPPZSWarptAR82ZHH9XRee+fV6ZiuVvW19OJOEtmMRa+ghbPFCHu ps1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9aV8xvON/mYdrhlrG7e1kkiuOQNtvF27lmT4wVIVpvPWIcA5WbQ0SlG7cHTq72gO5HzkA96KDxXZyHSiCvrDR7YY62Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.40.38 with SMTP id w35mr855473qgw.52.1449594108747; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.216] ([191.115.1.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o33sm1894404qkh.24.2015.12.08.09.01.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7t8U=W_K-Wv2ddzZc1Z=wk8TWoN2RUCrDim1ekv4oXmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:01:41 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0068E079-5B7B-4DB8-9AFF-F4C7E22D8305@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAHbuEH7t8U=W_K-Wv2ddzZc1Z=wk8TWoN2RUCrDim1ekv4oXmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/FXjxyLZDXosCiBr7k_ZfCbbQd70>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] errata id 4206
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:02:02 -0000

The normative text in Sec 4.1.3 is correct.

redirect_uri
         REQUIRED, if the "redirect_uri" parameter was included in the
         authorization request as described in 
         Section 4.1.1, and their values MUST be identical.

The example is arguably not the best worded.  

From the servers point of view the redirect_uri supplied in step A is identical to the one it uses in step C.

From the client’s point of view they receive a authorization response back on the redirect URI with additional parameters, 
so the redirect_uri value is only part of the response URI.

I think his wording is better, but what is there is not strictly speaking wrong.   

It is in non normative text, and the normative text is correct.

I would mark it as editorial.

John B.

> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> What do we do with the following errata, I don;t see any prior list responses:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14033.html
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth