IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for IETF#87 Meeting

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Wed, 17 July 2013 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562E911E80E2 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hy3JMQacGP27 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog109.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED121E8090 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob109.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUeb0/SPd9n7VxZqFQ76y1MLVCLvMvyA3@postini.com; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:13 PDT
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 9so5046241iec.33 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=1ZgOwg0s9A7/Yun/n45H3+/eupeSymitWM/5eiJB/zU=; b=H/gsXIokiypM8Y7qhmEfO2K79+lDZATPX5U/zsDHXeoCo91VpJsJuQz683v5RwI5pI lukO3TVVPJ1/CvGV8GnyipAKlEZWW5EO+FwTV6xnOMzlqnD657AK/YgWmnPPyNzL1lth k8yZKc/pBa5NmG2Su9tBDkCuXLYQ4Kx9znm0FW7bKl5xgqGHHptEL11MFs4vJltrCIGJ eQ+aVSoXJF+2c2YdwJg5VDIU7IgXCx06g/1rUxFpwdPShlKHtdiAgGofOFVYB0vp6sDy Ud9qWbWUpIwS992H4XQCS02Gr2RuUwgwYMTsk3G2AGCaiNbpuiuuh/DdeZluG0BKERWG c3sw==
X-Received: by 10.42.123.139 with SMTP id s11mr5372067icr.82.1374090492906; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.42.123.139 with SMTP id s11mr5372061icr.82.1374090492830; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.41.34 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E6346ECC-ECCB-4B5C-81F4-273EBCFBD365@gmx.net>
References: <E6346ECC-ECCB-4B5C-81F4-273EBCFBD365@gmx.net>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:47:42 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQ947zC+VdKL84Jro5wdw7u2EB4hSAGW03bUambmo_ynA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3010e719b6f3ed04e1ba5ff3"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwcNw3xkXhv4uhx3kTr7lJBwseh/RsnUXKHLVqM4LfdYh1lZ3ZBY49FeojOtUZj8udFbJ4ThDulahv0bb4Qm0RzwUPvkcOS0JkrAgFMrVQbvI5Lujc8NeI0CiVisny8YHFIfkpjw0kpOXyEADnOw1uI4uS1Q==
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda for IETF#87 Meeting
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:48:20 -0000

I do not believe there are any open issues on the assertion documents.

The week before the IETF meeting is just a few days away. What needs to
happen to get these back with the IESG?

Note that the JWT assertions draft is dependent on the base JWT document,
which is yet to go to WGLC and in tern depends on the JOSE work. Can it
still proceed or does it need to wait on those dependencies?

I had previously volunteered/requested to present the assertion drafts -
you've got Mike's name listed. I am happy not to do that however, if things
are progressing and there's nothing but status to discuss.


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

>
>  * Assertions (Mike Jones) -- if necessary
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions/
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer/
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer/
>
>  Goal: If there are still open issues we should discuss them.
>  Expectation is that the documents are back with the IESG
>  the week before the IETF meeting.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email