Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues

Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EC93A6CED for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZOqkFMx-FLe for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586523A6CB9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.12]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o8SIiel0008782 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:40 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1285699480; bh=1OEAF3S3hSnOFI/NwPJpB9isLB0=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=vMD/ybqBjj/oPqrJ7dxSi6JaFFFg5GHzGeR2NlIvE2wvbYX2fJAeTXjiV+Qu3ROyS QPOMJt/XJzzbdlPrnXHJg==
Received: from gwj16 (gwj16.prod.google.com [10.200.10.16]) by hpaq12.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o8SIic24020224 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:38 -0700
Received: by gwj16 with SMTP id 16so3036397gwj.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SwLpUaWqWt9OJeTB3G4douFckdemVIYGgYziXMIsoBo=; b=m2Dy3G2xje9A7IMCnE4NGgY9BLwPdbXQIRn2dGhhIT5R9YB8cw2TgyTxg644tm4VtG KLgyGyiBSp8Fi+6chQtg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=eKAHbHEYh5OoDeht6BAQ0CMuoG2Cn4t/7hN6e3HdA270DSZ0sGNKvuufv/yg/7Sb8G Jsk/xmqQe5AJhDsuqrdw==
Received: by 10.100.80.6 with SMTP id d6mr427445anb.64.1285699477940; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.187.10 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4CA21251.8040603@aol.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D460DB5BE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <4CA21251.8040603@aol.com>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:17 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=KJKHmRjEXPSGbvNiFeCR0T--ftVPmbR7pciDD@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Fletcher <gffletch@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "OAuth WG \(oauth@ietf.org\)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:44:00 -0000

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, George Fletcher <gffletch@aol.com> wrote:
> +1 I think this is a great path forward

+1


Marius