Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request

The reason for saying authorization request is that there are two types of
requests in RFC6749; authorization request and token request. This draft
deals with the former and thus named JAR.

Nat

2015年10月9日金曜日、Jim Manico<jim@manicode.com>さんは書きました:

> The word authorization is implied by OAuth, consider "OAuth 2.0 JWT
> Request".
>
> --
> Jim Manico
> @Manicode
> (808) 652-3805
>
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:43 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakimura@nri.co.jp');>> wrote:
>
> Hi OAuthers:
>
>
>
> One of the to do for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 is to come up with
> a better title.
> The current title “OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)”, is
> somewhat better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better
> name, I am all for it. Please let me know if you have an idea.
>
> Best,
>
> --
>
> Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakimura@nri.co.jp');>>
>
> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>
>
>
> PLEASE READ:
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for
> the named recipient(s) only.
>
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby
> notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of
> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
> error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your
> system.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OAuth@ietf.org');>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
http://twitter.com/_nat_en