Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 21:18 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD3121F852A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bdfyz9SOTXoP for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E85721F851C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob131.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+OPrHJ7VU83mqFtDO5VqwgQjvV9uUs5@postini.com; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:36 PDT
Received: by qadb33 with SMTP id b33so4278165qad.2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=wOdso3CA/HRtPLZWNRMjUOduhnXw9dQMMwZXW7z5WaY=; b=lx9xmX5Qivuuk2FrpAaM+5u+ldHS7vFNO2lhCBC5BE1ABD/eT9pIsVEGH5F+Grx8Ru fYzpKo0P9ayW1vFAEdmmGsmsTUIiyTiVfreHTulkeArh9jBB9mJ7NoBoc9DTQFZnttV1 I5986/45lyKgEFqQR4npCzgEsfeHF9JNnlThDodoIO+JEe/sANTVw+wa7Rr132IecRme f83N883NNDG7B41CpYdoPHOgoUY5EWn9oZa/wlE83ARMZH1z92T3bq3AMBuoZLAKCYT5 KV+2V19G24ZTSIbKK6i/U9pnQTh91wR0xVkKN3cIqMhDxGjQN+QNB1VevW7r3+LY/qE5 P78A==
Received: by 10.224.116.143 with SMTP id m15mr2067312qaq.50.1340313515407; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.87.142 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+sceJvFY_bhovjZrrXx7_C2P_WYcW4T1Jyh7f3Z2FTtg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVAcnGwv7yp=zwwAM--w-DubHfFpHFrKyHRzfe8Fjfg0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCS0DYEqk4SDNpWJKJvWZgTqHAkojQVTPuZKmySHPxBR1A@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665637A0@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CALaySJ+sceJvFY_bhovjZrrXx7_C2P_WYcW4T1Jyh7f3Z2FTtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:18:01 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCTBh-0T4Zvs+z6ibUnTd-JHtHBL9T5OYBi1Qxzpvm-d3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVcqTUCocCpnpTe5oZGkPE1cWlFGStJpZPQ9RBC6pnXF4UGu8siRVQchDK5IwrayLJgvBn
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:18:37 -0000
Thanks for clarifying Barry. And my apologies if I interpreted more "push" in your comments than there really was. I honestly can't envision the need for sub-registries so believe that a single one is more than sufficient. On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > No, there was no "push"; I was just making a suggestion for how things > might be set up. If there's no need envisoned for sub-registries, > that's fine. > > b
- [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-n… internet-drafts
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-s… Hannes Tschofenig