IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Possible alternative resolution to issue 26

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 04 October 2011 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6F621F8F58 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.592, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I098jDY-970M for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DE73C21F8F57 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2011 19:18:18 -0000
Received: from p5DCC39D6.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [93.204.57.214] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2011 21:18:18 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18pNIJLoccpcHDzitm8+lcJI15wIkP+z969WKh+kK BjE/XZa8C9oxmO
Message-ID: <4E8B5BF8.3040407@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:18:16 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435C21DD2C@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1129015546C@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> <1317621663.4810.YahooMailNeo@web31813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435C226298@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <1317704315.93442.YahooMailNeo@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4E8B2DE1.2090706@mtcc.com> <C2C10679-2611-415B-80B7-8526937C1E82@oracle.com> <1317747487.89926.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <6B898133-E7D0-45B1-9E3B-3B6DAFCDF671@oracle.com> <CAGdjJpJ+XkyPAJXEJa-3p3tNTxKzMpZXSHmH3H-m-7T9v=4x0Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739435C2276BD@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAGdjJpLeGECqjGrMZyBAx+ewA3KcMazaZxJsKS7h1Atj5Tp=Pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGdjJpLeGECqjGrMZyBAx+ewA3KcMazaZxJsKS7h1Atj5Tp=Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Possible alternative resolution to issue 26
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:15:15 -0000

On 2011-10-04 20:38, Marius Scurtescu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com
> <mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>     Existing practice is that simple ASCII strings like “email”
>     “profile”, “openid”, etc. are used as scope elements.  Requiring
>     them to be URIs would break most existing practice.
>
>
> Aren't these simple strings URIs? I think they are parsed as a URI with
> no scheme and authority only a path.

No, they are relative references: 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3986.html#rfc.section.4.2>.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status