Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 and RFC6749
nov matake <nov@matake.jp> Tue, 08 January 2013 01:31 UTC
Return-Path: <nov@matake.jp>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6062321F879D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:31:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3DAAWD+PaHFE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f42.google.com (mail-da0-f42.google.com [209.85.210.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96FC21F8782 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 17:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z17so9024577dal.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:31:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=GNzmYgworhZGvhCiOkqi6CR96GJ+TEmw1QNTaQWjbi0=; b=iK3yGGAvBMYX0kTr3ibXx7H1R5DfvkTFivM9HQVMHCjobk34ico9lT2dEASkmkdHU8 /pv4fu1PTB7d43cfjsMj2RryzwYh9GGAUWLXb5MdXZgzE+GzmmVNZ27EoirQNJWR6V0Q u6Y+QXCtlNI1CcV6S3A2Yf8UkYXt5iZ5OgHGmwnLzMmNyOIPttw50P+WzdPKFNXKOd62 1qXux7Udsx77/yPTbc+t93I81ShQULa9E1iCXGCa0IeAJoU1X91jn9hsSRJKb0oTXEUy p8jfPDHA7Xd+LIDPTScAojCFbmEXWZe6rcGkQEXvx8mTSuIfAy+6W4o5kLpfXXCFWpCz 9Jwg==
X-Received: by 10.68.230.101 with SMTP id sx5mr6613645pbc.50.1357608674442; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tov.cyberagent.co.jp (124x35x85x170.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [124.35.85.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc1sm39683408pab.3.2013.01.07.17.31.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:31:13 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6AD47DA-5471-44D5-9B09-7E611D6B4393"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: nov matake <nov@matake.jp>
In-Reply-To: <50EAE316.2060004@mitre.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:31:09 +0900
Message-Id: <E62E92CC-82E4-461C-9569-967B37BFB8A7@matake.jp>
References: <315782BC-0135-4A0C-8541-F0A002B9C30F@matake.jp> <50EAE316.2060004@mitre.org>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVBCba/J0yjDtmx65nlh63S7ZornN35vqwv/wdsyxmnH/4e0dhSyI9/AKEaLwT2PXp1Rvz
Cc: "WG oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 and RFC6749
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:31:15 -0000
Thanks Justin, I reported this errata at RFC errata report page. On 2013/01/08, at 0:00, Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org> wrote: > I believe you're correct, Nov, and that this was potentially a mistake from the RFC editor. That sentence *should* be talking about the resource owner's password. > > -- Justin > > On 01/07/2013 06:53 AM, nov matake wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I couldn't understand why "their" became "the third party's" in the diff between draft31 and RFC6749 below. >> >> === >> Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third-party third party >> without revoking access to all third-parties, third parties, and must do so by >> changing their the third party's password. >> >> (from http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=rfc6749) >> === >> >> I read "their" as "resource owners'". >> Is this typo, or am I missing some point? >> >> Thanks >> >> nov >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 and R… nov matake
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 a… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question on diff between draft31 a… nov matake