[OAUTH-WG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-10: (with COMMENT)

[Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

La mia bella recensione


resource_signing_alg_values_supported
        No default algorithms are implied if this entry is omitted.

What does this imply? Does it mean a value can be supplied later? Or
that the request will never be able to succeed?


In Section 5.1 there is an error message, but unlike earlier in the
document, there seems to be no language support here. I guess that
is a shortcoming of RFC6750.

I am also interested to hear the response to Orie's DISCUSS