Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-revocation

On 03/02/13 13:01, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> before I publish a new revision of the draft, I would like to sort out
> the following issues and would like to ask you for your feedback.
>
> - Authorization vs. access grant vs. authorization grant: I propose to
> use "authorization grant".
> - invalid_token error code: I propose to use the new error code
> "invalid_parameter" (as suggested by Peter and George). I don't see the
> need to register it (see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10604.html) but
> would like to get your advice.
> - Donald F. Coffin raised the need for a token_type parameter to the
> revocation request. Shall we re-consider this topic?

Yes please if possible (I'm assuming 'access token' should be default, 
with an option to say it is refresh token)

Cheers, Sergey


>
> best regards,
> Torsten.
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth