IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Openid-specs-fapi] Issuers, Discovery Docs & Brands

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Sat, 06 June 2020 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3503A0F9E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 01:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lodderstedt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULr51-DuFFnH for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 01:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF1CC3A0F9D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 01:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id o15so12672086ejm.12 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 01:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lodderstedt.net; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=wX4tXhubpwtV5EZF5UdcO/PLvu1/SAJbfLEqXOjld/A=; b=M2mFyFTaiZIeB04O8ufKuvOm9A6jbGL2THZ0tpx9GnpnPfc6eNZWEz/WmsvtNSD6K5 dISp0JAQr5CqnHATZlgFrYNFYN5Q/5qlMOmH9tzHLcyZGwPARRpej9w+ZI0ojZy2tMLh Sq/PCXuNE6OKc9xpVOYqNh084fJm57Iv1z3fAWq4Ubzs9jtgqfAPzVIIYP0+4wwKnwUT LkbZniWkqiCR/RCR7k546NARHBWQXlOQo183kh8SQvWGYt+a5i/rlrSEonu/gCytg4Dp olboLOYN8umwh9Q6/HgiLGosETTEgenO6DuX4jgTqTDBLUy8BwU7TBAtzsTjydzr0BXR LTsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=wX4tXhubpwtV5EZF5UdcO/PLvu1/SAJbfLEqXOjld/A=; b=LI5Z76K4NDXKwYzzQipq/3yAwSobSKDek1mgYyb2ImdA8BrqfVDrnqMJRRVinh5T+U GPUxaqf2huL4d/aqosT12a0rBSTa3bij5s6x+5Ms9Snw0/P+GI52NyGKDjiClxoMeIAa t5ePSj2BjF4pPFfEGwvmAcfRBPo+E4RhOvsbbZxHINH7xJkCxaw5eyA49V30hdWO8bk+ V1QO3/8CTHXNo7HyG6f7oK7QHJLxkS9/qYwBr3P1uP3ZdKc0AKPwdBS/uvm6gS+byPe8 yz6V6EnF41ctXha7JUqZmnNOZFIcD36cbUwRNY5JzQTTX0KvHf0LqqbHGWsFyn0SX/pJ 8GIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Bdbu8zf6hJRTCI35hHSAgltbHwsIlcG12t9vNYY18ZlB2aTAj kn6pK2e4KT7CZ4JMsjcC/cDTJA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy3j8tpruWsaBZJtmIDb6CSVWl1ZhzOwM6WTqWPPXWlJ63QWRyJJLwizfNoh5GaizvbqFSPaw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:ab9:: with SMTP id bz25mr12252297ejc.39.1591433120220; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 01:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:598:90a7:28b3:f8be:3610:ba20:d03a? ([2a01:598:90a7:28b3:f8be:3610:ba20:d03a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y62sm271233edy.61.2020.06.06.01.45.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 01:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-43C32448-7B02-4E76-ADD5-25C4D3D13401"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 10:45:17 +0200
Message-Id: <53944EF3-4BF8-4555-BEE8-B9522A7D1501@lodderstedt.net>
References: <0CD7A267-59D0-4815-BC24-3A0C80321542@authlete.com>
Cc: Francis Pouatcha <fpo=40adorsys.de@dmarc.ietf.org>, Joseph Heenan <joseph@authlete.com>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0CD7A267-59D0-4815-BC24-3A0C80321542@authlete.com>
To: Financial API Working Group List <openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17F75)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/IG2IIrAsFSaF4kW4elYAjkrKK5o>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Openid-specs-fapi] Issuers, Discovery Docs & Brands
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:45:24 -0000


> Am 04.06.2020 um 15:52 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-fapi <openid-specs-fapi@lists.openid.net>:
> 
> In the cases Dave and I are thinking of, there’s no SSO between the different brands (sorry,I’m struggling to find a better word than brands!), which also have segmented user credentials - there’s no user confusion.

Segmented user credentials to me indicate that different issuers should be used. I don’t see the advantage of using the same issuer if the user realms are different.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email