Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer

Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63C411E80E1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kiFMe7g+mxph for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF66F11E80C8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) by p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 7vJK1j00D0EuLVk01vJK91; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:18:19 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:18:19 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
Thread-Index: AQHNLgtSd1ClKC8By0eIWfRqfLMBr5bBvE/AgACCdgD//5IooIAAeQmA//+KyGA=
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:18:19 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010260A9@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <0E17EDDE-567A-40BF-9CB9-0D6B757FF0A5@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010259C4@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201025F4F@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <934776D1-7419-46D7-BA8C-2B4666E64A6E@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <934776D1-7419-46D7-BA8C-2B4666E64A6E@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:18:20 -0000

Thanks. This is the clarification I was seeking.

EH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:17 PM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
> 
> No, don't share your interpretation about the IPR with us on the mailing list.
> 
> However, if you come to the conclusion that the IPR situation is unacceptable
> for you then you could withdraw your previously stated support for the
> document. If everyone or many do that then we have to find a plan B.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> 
> > So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I
> wanted to clarify. You asked the WG to "think" about its potential
> implications but I don't want that "thinking" to happen out-loud on this list...
> >
> > Raising the issue with your internal IPR team is the right step.
> >
> > EH
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:37 AM
> >> To: Eran Hammer
> >> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
> >>
> >> Hi Eran,
> >>
> >> if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your
> >> products) then you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for
> their judgement.
> >> They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR
> >> applicable and whether they had experience with the IPR holder already.
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Hannes
> >>
> >> On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> >>
> >>> What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people
> >>> here
> >> are not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about
> >> the patent's validity or even applicability as these are questions
> >> for lawyers, not engineers.
> >>>
> >>> EH
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >>>> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM
> >>>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
> >>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document
> >>>> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it:
> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/
> >>>>
> >>>> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing
> >>>> and we would also like the working group to check the IPR and to
> >>>> think about potential implications.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ciao
> >>>> Hannes & Derek
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OAuth mailing list
> >>>> OAuth@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >