Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form parameters
Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Mon, 18 June 2012 22:17 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C135A11E80D9 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEJUqdMDGGVE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A44F11E80C1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) by p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id PyHh1j0030Dcg9U01yHhTz; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:17:41 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.66]) by P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:17:41 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form parameters
Thread-Index: AQHNSHuYNn5GyPRYwECfY+U4MeoAcZcBHIEA//+SpkA=
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:17:40 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201077978@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <4FD70812.6040108@gmx.de> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436655A58E@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436655A58E@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [80.36.76.35]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form parameters
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:17:42 -0000
I believe the UTF-8 piece came from Brian Eaton a while back because of some security issue identified at Google. EH > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Mike Jones > Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:48 PM > To: Julian Reschke; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form parameters > > Hi Julian, > > Both the Core and Bearer specs already reference W3C.REC-html401- > 19991224 for the definition of application/x-www-form-urlencoded. > > I'll leave it up to others to comment on whether the ;charset=UTF-8 > parameter is correct or not. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:13 AM > To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form parameters > > Hi there, > > re <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-27#section-4.3.2>: > > This needs a normative reference to a spec that defines the application/x- > www-form-urlencoded media type (such as > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/iana.html#application-x-www-form- > urlencoded>). > > Looking at the media type definition I don't see any mention of a charset > parameter, so the example probably is wrong. See also > <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/form-submission.html#url-encoded-form- > data>: > > "Note: Parameters on the application/x-www-form-urlencoded MIME type > are ignored. In particular, this MIME type does not support the charset > parameter." > > I would also advise to change > > The client makes a request to the token endpoint by adding the > following parameters using the "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" > format in the HTTP request entity-body: > > grant_type > REQUIRED. Value MUST be set to "password". > username > REQUIRED. The resource owner username, encoded as UTF-8. > password > REQUIRED. The resource owner password, encoded as UTF-8. > scope > OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by > Section 3.3. > > to > > > The client makes a request to the token endpoint by sending the > following parameters using the "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" > format (Section 4.10.22.5 of [WD-html5-20120329]) and a > character encoding of "UTF-8" in the HTTP request entity-body: > > grant_type > REQUIRED. Value MUST be set to "password". > username > REQUIRED. The resource owner username. > password > REQUIRED. The resource owner password. > scope > OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by > Section 3.3. > > Finally, it would be good if the example used characters that require escaping > in the body, such as "&", "%", or non-ASCII characters. > > (similar nits apply to other sections using form encoding) > > Best regards, Julian > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using form pa… Julian Reschke
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using for… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using for… Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using for… Julian Reschke
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] nits about definition of using for… Julian Reschke