Re: [OAUTH-WG] application/x-www-form-urlencoded vs JSON

"Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> Wed, 21 April 2010 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346B3A6995 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.605, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1gdo5zjwucvA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipxavo.tcif.telstra.com.au (ipxavo.tcif.telstra.com.au [203.35.135.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3B13A698B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,246,1270389600"; d="scan'208,217";a="1311609"
Received: from unknown (HELO ipcdvi.tcif.telstra.com.au) ([10.97.217.212]) by ipoavi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2010 10:04:52 +1000
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,5957"; a="941341"
Received: from wsmsg3756.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.84]) by ipcdvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2010 10:04:52 +1000
Received: from WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.159]) by wsmsg3756.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.84]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:04:52 +1000
From: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:04:50 +1000
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] application/x-www-form-urlencoded vs JSON
Thread-Index: Acrg0NuNNWRZGnXGQgmBDzZbSI5UKQAFCEsQ
Message-ID: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E11257784CD4@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <9890332F-E759-4E63-96FE-DB3071194D84@gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723438E30A379B@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <20100419134825.134951nuzvi35hk4@webmail.df.eu> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723438E5C7F45E@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <t2wc334d54e1004200924ja0e7786u9b349a1931098f2a@mail.gmail.com> <l2ofd6741651004201245gdfc6e2a3j10a6e8a3e59f2072@mail.gmail.com> <1271793363.20679.6.camel@Dynamo> <j2wc334d54e1004201417s1bbcc025r76fdb607295f384c@mail.gmail.com> <9FB1C9A1-6E27-45B8-AFD5-649AD8591AFF@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <9FB1C9A1-6E27-45B8-AFD5-649AD8591AFF@hueniverse.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E11257784CD4WSMSG3153Vsrv_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] application/x-www-form-urlencoded vs JSON
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:05:16 -0000

+1 to JSON as the one and only response format.

It is common enough. It is simple enough. It is flexible enough. It is unambiguously specified enough.



I suggested a structure in the “application/credentials” thread.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg01920.html





--

James Manger