Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Thu, 11 September 2014 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEC41A017A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmc20GIIJySd for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (mail-qg0-f44.google.com [209.85.192.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB0F1A0172 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f51so9580640qge.17 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=wwEm5Ex0ku1ShJmSvcgNOkXJ69uUCu0JVS+tIAaX7yw=; b=Fu5ipidI95CtCOa16opkFMCNvFIya63D4r0BD55fKv1hw+uDP1GqzDHdC2XU0PS8b6 453kxdo0NlYEsbNHGwSZHSFixQFRZ6w0lAFxmVITd0S7cu5yWdhk7f0W+X9SLUikEgd6 KROQ6ZeZstuOOR3zD5L302Q5yE6LtqH9D7NUjw6k/uwNXNVPOLzyHrOFaOORm1gkKhKx Lv0ydoJoaDFIdyJsbThpyXR8mPZmEI2kJo3zUPqDG+qbIbNfhYapJaC9xY6T4rvgk0Ns beeibPrHlOxAqStdUGJ1Q9B7l8Jzpgs+Jm3ECeeMllUbFFUraqN5UG3x2uWFgRARf7H3 XyIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbXGA6YHT2rNR/U7M87pxWBYv9tnUBA31lEFtC9q7J+1CzrmbvpRP4QQ2vkqV93IDBlPiJ
X-Received: by 10.224.46.67 with SMTP id i3mr6380533qaf.90.1410474418161; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.37] (186-106-172-214.baf.movistar.cl. [186.106.172.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k52sm1633609qge.42.2014.09.11.15.26.56 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6D30A4A6-CE23-4BEE-9FDC-1C193C124FB2"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <541220B5.2000801@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:26:53 -0300
Message-Id: <E804BB5D-9D90-4D32-86A5-0BF962923F83@ve7jtb.com>
References: <541220B5.2000801@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/JAyMsAVxYrHlrzvAuv5Anop0bH8
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC 6749
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:27:02 -0000

Some large number of us would be roasted by our legal departments if we looked at a patent.

Discussing the specifics of patents is not appropriate for a WG meeting.

Someone from  the IETF should look at the issue but not me.

John B.

On Sep 11, 2014, at 7:22 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> in private messages I have gotten questions about this IPR announcement
> received in March 2014 and the potential implications on the core OAuth
> 2.0 protocol. I was thinking about putting it on the agenda for the next
> IETF meeting.
> 
> The feedback I am hoping to get is whether there is a concern about this
> IPR from those who have products and services based on OAuth.
> 
> I want to know whether you see problems or not. If you have problems,
> maybe there are ways to engineer around it.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> PS: If someone has time to review the state of the art in 2009 I would
> also like to chat with you.
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related
> to RFC 6749
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:33:05 -0700
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
> To: dick.hardt@gmail.com
> CC: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com,
> Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, derek@ihtfp.com, oauth@ietf.org,
> ipr-announce@ietf.org
> 
> 
> Dear Dick Hardt:
> 
> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "The OAuth 2.0
> Authorization Framework" (RFC6749) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on
> 2014-03-28 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual
> Property Rights
> Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2336/). The title of the IPR
> disclosure is "Nokia Corporation's Statement about IPR related to RFC
> 6749."");
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth