Re: [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft
Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 29 April 2010 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9E73A697F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.879, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qh8ubWflW28p for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 54ECC3A6953 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10795 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 20:09:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.19) by p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 20:09:35 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT001.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.19]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:09:32 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "Brian Eaton (beaton@google.com)" <beaton@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:09:29 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft
Thread-Index: AcriffBdeSFCKNRoRZWdslYCVXmJcwFT1kcg
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234393217709D@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <w2udaf5b9571004221742o19b88819m37d8b80a4882c97b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <w2udaf5b9571004221742o19b88819m37d8b80a4882c97b@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:09:50 -0000
> access token definition is: "A unique identifier used by the client" > > I agree with Dick, tokens are not identifiers. Please suggest text. > "The redirection URI MUST NOT includes a query component as defined by > [RFC3986] section 3 if the state parameter is present." -> Wow. This is > convoluted. How did we get here? See previous discussion. > "secret_type" - wouldn't this flow always return a bearer token? Why? EHL
- [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] misc comments on draft Eran Hammer-Lahav