[OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Mon, 14 June 2010 14:13 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E353A6989 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.226
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.226 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.227, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xygMCu6ZlSTA for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D113A68A5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o5EEDLTn003452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:13:22 +0200
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net (demuexc025.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.12]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o5EEDLGe001710 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:13:21 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:13:21 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:13:42 +0300
Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502B29B75@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Planning for upcoming IETF meeting
Thread-Index: AcsLy8sPSA9icRaVSoKjDkyLnDTOfw==
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2010 14:13:21.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE7B4F50:01CB0BCB]
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 14:13:24 -0000
Hi all, Those who attended the last IETF meeting noticed that the actual working group slots are quite short (around 2 hours). The feedback I got was that this does not leave us with enough time to get work done. I understand that argument and acknowledge that not everyone wants to attend a punch of other working group (even though I believe it would be useful todo so) and therefore staying the entire week does not make a lot of sense either. Traveling to a remote location for a 2 hour meeting then does not sound super efficient. The plan I had discussed with Blaine is the following: Once the final IETF meeting agenda is available we will pick time slots all over the week (one every day). I will organize a room and we can get together to discuss open issues until we reach a point where we need to dig into the details (often requiring text to be written). Writing such text contributions will then happen afterwards so that we can continue our discussion during the next slot. This will hopefully help us to get some open issues investigated in detail and to have text proposals available. The official working group meeting slot would be used to summarize the work on the text proposals and to get input from the larger community. Thoughts? Ciao Hannes & Blaine
- [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Planning for upcoming IETF meeting Hannes Tschofenig