[OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 13 April 2012 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFEF21F868A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KEJZaWgeeOfr for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 11EE621F866A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 07:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2012 14:36:03 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.101]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 13 Apr 2012 16:36:03 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SKBwtDv7SqGWnLjjCjh9Br+h/CzwHx7mpP7dN9A pEUUUQa6ByNlbL
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:36:02 +0300
Message-Id: <5F51A14F-D548-4D29-B20F-5C3DCB3CB705@gmx.net>
To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:36:06 -0000

Hi all, 

at the IETF#83 OAuth working group meeting we had some confusion about the Dynamic Client Registration and the Simple Web Discovery item. I just listened to the audio recording again. 

With the ongoing mailing list discussion regarding WebFinger vs. Simple Web Discovery I hope that folks had a chance to look at the documents again and so the confusion of some got resolved.  

I believe the proposed new charter item is sufficiently clear with regard to the scope of the work. Right? 
Here is the item again:
"
Jul. 2013  Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard

[Starting point for the work will be 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreg
] 
"

Of course there there is a relationship between Simple Web Discovery (or WebFinger) and the dynamic client registration since the client first needs to discover the client registration endpoint at the authorization server before interacting with it. 

Now, one thing that just came to my mind when looking again at draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreq was the following: Could the Client Registration Request and Response protocol exchange could become a profile of the SCIM protocol? In some sense this exchange is nothing else than provisioning an account at the Authorization Server (along with some meta-data).

Is this too far fetched? 

Ciao
Hannes