Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol
Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 16:46 UTC
Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AD73A6E34 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wirKfu7Tt0tQ for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49F13A6E33 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o9IGlerQ016493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.244.40.89] (faynberg.lra.lucent.com [135.244.40.89]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o9IGlcti024696; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:39 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4CBC7A2A.70405@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:47:38 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Niklas Neumann <niklas.neumann@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <4CBC6FC0.5040708@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <4CBC6FC0.5040708@cs.uni-goettingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:46:22 -0000
Niklas Neumann wrote: > ... > I was wondering if there is interest in employing such a protocol in > cases where the HTTP redirection schemes of OAuth are not available or > not working well (e.g. desktop applications without access to a user > agent or authentication from a different device/application than the > one accessing the consumer). A lot of interest on my part. Igor
- [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Niklas Neumann
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Niklas Neumann
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol Niklas Neumann