Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 24 January 2012 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9431C21F84DA; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:18:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id StlGBR0dQ3Th; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BA021F84D7; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:18:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.240.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1165F22E25C; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:18:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:18:36 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D97B96E-4186-4B63-A254-013D803FD459@mnot.net>
References: <4F1D847A.6060404@gmx.de>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:18:47 -0000

My comments were made in:
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg03805.html

Most of them (excepting the nits) haven't been addressed in the drafts.

Regards,



Begin forwarded message:

> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0	Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:46:43 -0800
> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> CC: oauth@ietf.org
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Web Authorization Protocol WG
> (oauth) to consider the following document:
> - 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens'
>  <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> as a Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-02-06. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>   This specification describes how to use bearer tokens in HTTP
>   requests to access OAuth 2.0 protected resources.  Any party in
>   possession of a bearer token (a "bearer") can use it to get access to
>   the associated resources (without demonstrating possession of a
>   cryptographic key).  To prevent misuse, bearer tokens need to be
>   protected from disclosure in storage and in transport.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/