IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Nat <sakimura@gmail.com> Sat, 25 September 2010 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED00D3A6A6A for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btmQY4etDNIF for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4D73A67FA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so996531pzk.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc :x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=b82AST6v8p0ou4yyu6x548xDuZdvHF9oGblE7yJuQ+M=; b=VdU89Qbk9UsANAalfgmRKSrGBHIx+rUSJ1QcPuIhxI5VDwoMRQS/uJvMJVeoltH7+z EPxNeHbD1oBxM97fuEyVaTRPP25BVZIahj8YXoOu/YFKdVb92B2tN6ah8lgWqBI2k1iJ 6UoEeYt7tZunkyt8McOpMivVmEvWiwOeQ20Os=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=N5iH1Ue9/68nyko3Fggpvz8C4+6er0C3MinVRqIwoSOHyXrRU8svMcSnZmtO5QcllY lSMeyjafItcEteBxEhEUAQBgSvRm81G+zEI2kb9dZyGA1Bm6PAbTOwJY253MT+gBbpWr w78lvtiVou8sOV3g8OkG/oZ9jZ2g4R2Sas7p8=
Received: by 10.142.172.13 with SMTP id u13mr3413959wfe.307.1285374938332; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [119.107.197.29] (wf01-119-107-197-29.uqwimax.jp [119.107.197.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l42sm2997428wfa.21.2010.09.24.17.35.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <02C067B5-1C94-4E2C-9035-92664C324362@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117)
From: Nat <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 09:35:39 +0900
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:35:08 -0000

+1 on referencing separate spec from the core. 
-1 for actually defining the sig inside the core. 

=nat @ Tokyo via iPhone

On 2010/09/24, at 10:43, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:

> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
> 
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
> 
> EHL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email