Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 100

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Wed, 27 September 2017 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC21134EB2 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WAkJEp65OdfL for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E8C134EAE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id m103so16297628iod.13 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=gmail; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RsWw+xvtnkssZ4CzM8D5C7BUH6eh9gDxvczTM8dtc8o=; b=ch7zMY/GR9EeOGNI7EMuF1W3sKulpBT+ISm3OCxYuX1/IoZ6meSMUOz4h/Y4WfjHI6 vr3HwbtIdP+ViD7w/oT46XD/AhQDPCc0uI261ybgWTYh5mCFERszAQsL9cQE0/+ItcAQ 51ht8p8vWeCOVkRzofITzAvY4dPN1pE/oSyMQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RsWw+xvtnkssZ4CzM8D5C7BUH6eh9gDxvczTM8dtc8o=; b=AzTmmUd7j4o1SZA8dAXG3bPG8fW4ZuEM690lVsIoFjYVVHKehUwvlmXvBNMuCRX5Ds MVk6erLLITSCiysUI1lPhjveW758CAoV1E/lLq0EeFBcpKz3hhxxhWBmuU8H1qPo3kA8 9Qo3PkHSr1nfHmAmN7RvK2wA9l1XiKQHndaMZ0UhKav34M8x/LgJU4ty8/GSEwrkd90r GTbwW6Mu/URo/4rMkwZ/XDa83TSGS4NRGoy/AnBwPyjX/FT9siqc5ofIsyL/8ahBK/qD ZWeDzIiboawIN5BrCeh2xWR3jLSigmtn+n3TD1tHbmpyRl6JTpuIQqNdtCAYd8SX0HWw Z+4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVIwk5SxR7vY0dY4WfFRbtMJekNOgA6E8Wb7FZjLCLg5s7qp+qc XTFh+bzkPr//WvuorJPf3N6GAe6+QmtZ/JRQwxycG6i6qG1zIGm/XHY7TbVSMIeNyXPIdm8Axs/ fQO+cCtOiYYwx6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QA8D1CxQt9ZoMkDHI0P5J3i8EN58akX8KpDWwHI9F8I5PvmmE/Kejn3IBDNZEx/YZkPAGqne5mXNn85evOYjQc=
X-Received: by 10.107.130.224 with SMTP id m93mr3507496ioi.82.1506533766507; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.1.206 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150653315332.25011.10428786780586096514.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150653315332.25011.10428786780586096514.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:35:35 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCQqKYFJyTEB_2gWoC=6k0ep7Pw02nSaOeXgeUBY8btwsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>, oauth-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eee7cfef509055a2f3979"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/M13MAZKbLwHVWLKgyGrxt4zX9j8>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 100
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:36:10 -0000

Can we possibly also try and avoid conflicts with tokbind?

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:25 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <
session-request@ietf.org> wrote:

>
>
> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Rifaat
> Shekh-Yusef, a Chair of the oauth working group.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Working Group Name: Web Authorization Protocol
> Area Name: Security Area
> Session Requester: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>
> Number of Sessions: 2
> Length of Session(s):  1.5 Hours, 1.5 Hours
> Number of Attendees: 50
> Conflicts to Avoid:
>  First Priority: saag core tls ace sipcore acme
>
>
>
>
> People who must be present:
>   Eric Rescorla
>   Hannes Tschofenig
>   Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>
> Resources Requested:
>
> Special Requests:
>   Please avoid conflict with sec area BoFs. Please avoid Monday.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

-- 
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you.*