[OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Virtual Meeting During IETF 107?

William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <wdenniss@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CF33A0143 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxX8JyPd8KBf for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51A83A0140 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id e9so3732571otr.12 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9fYwuh+xEBYfv4EdgcrfsHeQZj4Lg7oHra32eIjquhE=; b=IErl9O40/k32rXHiirc84IYttUyk7Ryvdr0w5dOKg/7raW18AVQR6NcFd34FCSreQZ XyMATKPsEhQPVRXAr4YmVoy+cnv4d/0vJILSHNWQDctFO3B3IaXP94lxncgmPaXO0gtM 9qZ8dCUowQ5/KVFKCMBNLyF9/OONak6TUnrkk15GoFc5JpQExNVH2R1/cTMzV5wmePhz ZXWUIPBrYT9vOpXH6khONedeMovqe09fNg+t0/4LeNvw8IibJSSlq+c1vGzaCTVQKQ1J qYRiaMN947lm9XvUTMQ8JmKWTw7Yyu5MuV3zq+De1tU2gIYC3V92O68c4NN3X1jhNcCV eyhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9fYwuh+xEBYfv4EdgcrfsHeQZj4Lg7oHra32eIjquhE=; b=Cltc0ZqbhpS2URmXkJOB3JsHAqOuinllxBaLLxDl57FHlvXOo1IEVlU7Uyyarjp8j+ qc0yx3j6AXmjHXMormkF1sgE/Uex5a0MejW/BdQ0Vj8rXjkvdGe6y0wvVb9hLPCclp4P c36cryFROKMFl9l2Zcf1BbndK9cxnXO/bcg4zuWEHyi64sL6lrYkmJk7Os3JGlOOE6yC 8aS6AoKwQDaFv1uJKhcq2Kd1JnEnHiFFgip70/QHOz1cgjToviahTytJMCL5fLY5DFfT DHOfGwJLx5aGwQYB13441Iz6wM5ppQAVpM8YumQ1YTN3IoyuxzZLJI0Sot3K5ERnNTE9 xY5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3pRK1NjEL9i7+4zV4ZkFZ5ioflrpUCCQfxSAyizbq1tQ0gCfcJ En7wPkxipHxAuKC5qcjMQek79hhAJzh0SMc0eByr9Lw4yUI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vto9F/vkKPeBW9Uc8fxHf4PMlxQcDgIXF6F5U+6?= =?utf-8?q?TZacGd4qWcs1mMl1JZeS9AqhBHCi0xG/UPOULoOiTOGC9Dg=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3ae:: with SMTP id f43mr11783606otf.159.1584121082208; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:37:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAP42hAVRk1sSCao3yA=kCy_H4oBHNL7hnTFjYTGp7=CE44=hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000634f5f05a0bfee13"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/MAOJB3EonqaUQYcnWxf4iy-8EVs>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Virtual Meeting During IETF 107?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:38:08 -0000

Now that the IETF 107 virtual meeting agenda was posted
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/cVDlJ4fVJIkfakBysTfsFchERCs/>,
and only includes BOFs and new WGs, should we schedule our own virtual
meeting for the same week?

Maybe for simplicity, we could even keep the original Vancouver schedule
for this work group, just conducted online?

William