Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Wed, 20 January 2016 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016241A037A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:05:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrKBJbBzW-jm for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A3B1A036E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s5so49557758qkd.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:05:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BlkM6x17jEhuvzZ7vEBJQ6GxROcqB3SQ5xWq+D2ObRs=; b=RDx6CHCT8KIaOzNikM4MQhLideVyk7rAJ+2ndz90X57HbEgZkr1x7RSoQ4zQJ7qbtT WZmowmcO1em/FFUQ+H9HA3KHQy7y8fGagAA590uwKdYNRolGoXZqSSexg1AfBiJX688J gl+IdHlWmu+GIlivMUMudIp8QMxkfd1yZhIhe11v0nfTzzY9GmW14KjhEuGdBZfHbZqf NDGI3nlZRq4rpbuPOqESeawUILpruUVTu4JxILVYT7sorBRbVEKL6sFG1gnVYMmyColR Yk6modujf4zssb+bS79ehviuW8RsphobQkpDBxZSnfXIyg1xX0akcf3x52hVWMiJDsKt PZYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=BlkM6x17jEhuvzZ7vEBJQ6GxROcqB3SQ5xWq+D2ObRs=; b=lzac5BPaUhE4BkSss9ah5Qk4AS7N5KXU0pIBaMfItB6bYeej5oMP/5wqEzE5agqaCe 7JhxsvJOd7iMbu4Olf/iKtt6DmEp9eFkvYCCd6HzqvkbN4vaQh66iD1F227vyMPGUnje Wagdg+WSOYGtOMRo70bpVzoWcq+tPrK4dy/b6YD0LCGnuuWwBPIKQgjomAfxA8DpTYk6 M2sUu73Miz0CRavY8x/VHMszz9RvkXVbeetp0SqcqmKex0afcZGIEHalN4ztdHi9oS7N wwXuKhkWCCngggyjkpCl1YMr/6X2kP7u1eO2pk7k6e/j71zvmS/7uMMOHj7PePXFiNOf RjlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRukpvKzzNv/8jIVv04zrurzqe6cfImeooivc9LZFzqrDpCoC+V2lv0kCMYqzJMVc9hmqPbEa8/LbvyqU9akuoYxaliA==
X-Received: by 10.55.71.135 with SMTP id u129mr43354533qka.26.1453259116402; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:05:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <569E2076.2090405@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <569E2076.2090405@gmx.net>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 03:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CABzCy2D8BvJkLCc543=pEdE4FZa+p1ekyuMs=TtVSnSCrTrviw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a7d20665f250529bb41e6
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/MP0F1M4YaD0rr98PwrB3lZqdSwI>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 03:05:19 -0000

Thanks Hannes.

I did not find https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-meta-05, which
was discussed in Yokohama, and was largely in agreement if my recollection
is correct. Why is it not in the call for adoption?



2016年1月19日(火) 20:39 Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>;:

> Hi all,
>
> we have submitted our new charter to the IESG (see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15379.html) and
> since some IESG members like to see an updated list of milestones as
> well. For this reason, based on a suggestion from Barry, we are also
> starting a call for adoption concurrently with the review of the charter
> text by the IESG.
>
> We will post separate mails on the individual documents. Your feedback
> is important! Please take the time to look at the documents and provide
> your feedback.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>