Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6493A6AE8 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oR6aEjKEtEnJ for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog112.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B20613A6AD5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([209.85.161.51]) by na3sys009aob112.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTKI+mCqrmAlXZXsBSZbXdhMzT/g5WgmC@postini.com; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:49 PDT
Received: by mail-fx0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 2so4883239fxm.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.106.196 with SMTP id y4mr546068fao.68.1285701271510; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.113.3 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=KJKHmRjEXPSGbvNiFeCR0T--ftVPmbR7pciDD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D460DB5BE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <4CA21251.8040603@aol.com> <AANLkTi=KJKHmRjEXPSGbvNiFeCR0T--ftVPmbR7pciDD@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:14:01 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-L3RsOWODioRudJn6c76KROjgKg9W8r=eNuVr@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "OAuth WG \(oauth@ietf.org\)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:14:09 -0000

+1 seems like a pragmatic compromise

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Marius Scurtescu
<mscurtescu@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, George Fletcher <gffletch@aol.com> wrote:
>> +1 I think this is a great path forward
>
> +1
>
>
> Marius
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>