Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-urn-sub-ns-00.txt

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Barry,

The new draft has been submitted and is up at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-00 (no changes
other than the document name/identifier).  I'll send a note to
iesg-secretary shortly.

-Brian



On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Following up on this:
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:45, Barry Leiba <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> On 7/29/11 3:07 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
>>> Following up from
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg06949.html a few
>>> weeks ago, I've submitted a new I-D to establish an IETF URN
>>> Sub-Namespace for OAuth (urn:ietf:params:oauth:*:*).  Eran balked at
>>> putting this in the core spec so it made sense to produce a separate
>>> draft for it.  I'd like to request from the group and the chairs that
>>> this draft become a work item of the WG as soon as possible. The SAML
>>> draft will utilize this to register a proper URN for the extension
>>> grant type and presumably the JWT draft will as well.   Hopefully it
>>> will be useful in other contexts as well (like the oob parameter that
>>> has been discussed).
>>>
>>> The draft is available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-urn-sub-ns-00
>>
>> Given the progress that the OAuth WG has made, the fact that we're in
>> WGLC on two major documents, and the fact that the SAML draft depends
>> upon what's in here, I have no issue with adding this as a WG item.
>> Stephen, do you agree with that?  (I know that Stephen's away for a
>> bit, and won't be responding for a while.  This can wait until he gets
>> back, and in the meantime the SAML doc can assume that this one is
>> going forward.)
>
> Having seen support from Stephen for this direction, gotten agreement
> from my co-chairs, and seen no objection from the working group, I
> have pre-approved "draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns" as a working group
> item.  Brian, please submit a new version under that name, and send a
> note to iesg-secretary asking them to mark the new document as
> replacing the old one.
>
> Everyone, please give this document some review, and make comments.
>
> Barry, as chair
>