IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 23 January 2012 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C319321F8664 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:45:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.814, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnel2uKlzG2e for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 17E1521F8661 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:45:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2012 17:39:15 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp059) with SMTP; 23 Jan 2012 18:39:15 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+vNLNbPiKvpHsb50YBBPBVBDJTqwH2tg4cwQpM4s bFMryQN0c3ZL/7
Message-ID: <4F1D9B40.9070901@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:39:12 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
References: <20120123154643.16223.44509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F1D8391.3080009@gmx.de> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366375F80@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366375F80@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:45:56 -0000

On 2012-01-23 18:24, Mike Jones wrote:
> As editor of the Oauth Bearer spec, I believe that these comments have been well understood and considered by the working group.  I do understand that the working group's consensus position is different than Julian's.  See these notes documenting that this is the case:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08113.html
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08116.html
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08121.html
> ...

We are going in circles; see 
<https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08118.html>.

I can only recommend that people who want to know what's going on read 
the complete mail thread.

Also I'd like to point out that I *did* recommend to go to IETF LC 
despite these issues because I believe that more review from outside the 
WG is needed here.

Best regards, Julian

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email