IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] New OAuth for Browser-Based Apps draft -02

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Thu, 25 July 2019 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241C01202A9 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2XpBel_fVEx for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay07.ispgateway.de (smtprelay07.ispgateway.de [134.119.228.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26AB1202CC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [91.13.158.20] (helo=[192.168.71.102]) by smtprelay07.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1hqiyj-0002n3-3R; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:00:37 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-E539D436-16D3-4053-8B0F-ED43F5449AA0"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203)
In-Reply-To: <99169CD8-F415-43CB-9F93-D779E5A15592@alkaline-solutions.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:00:36 +0200
Cc: Brian Campbell <bcampbell=40pingidentity.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6EC1147B-B23C-44E6-84AF-9E79D384153A@lodderstedt.net>
References: <CAGBSGjqVV3jJaXEX28N_fKbLSp3ijzb34N9NrZwZ+ZNXwXGKAg@mail.gmail.com> <0C094925-1429-46ED-8CF6-0D7B8DFB332F@lodderstedt.net> <CA+k3eCT5eG=S9AjM7Ss=DwHvsjwnriuZC3_yMxhrUaJXf2-vrw@mail.gmail.com> <99169CD8-F415-43CB-9F93-D779E5A15592@alkaline-solutions.com>
To: David Waite <david@alkaline-solutions.com>
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/NqekTdmoIIKGB_FdTSLOlBl7WEo>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New OAuth for Browser-Based Apps draft -02
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:00:54 -0000


> Am 24.07.2019 um 04:13 schrieb David Waite <david@alkaline-solutions.com>:
> 
> Perhaps it should be turned into a stated document assumption (that the reader has decided to use OAuth) rather than guidance later in the document (that OAuth may not be the best fit)

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email