Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2
Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Fri, 13 July 2012 00:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2D311E80E6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.285
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.285 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5+tXg7bZBDP for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D411E80CC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so4772369pbc.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=HK0u5klcBoHWBuHPHEf9fcHgRg3M450JjO4hFYPAUhA=; b=y+TMlKoSgMsxq5KoyL5AdVzFflDyWWQ+687dVccoipy5ailfRFba2iqmYm6nxHbtqc mPJyTbaMKx8H8qD5mtYOAswxFndJmmqUK9RvY/kCVbdCaLe6+0BYii0OunZG/IE/6OPy vC9uHRwL4+N4v2H6w0mr6r9MTvdbK2/0cJupkNMCcpBot8dPLpucVkIyp2tv9kVKOKPZ Qhe6jzcOXjWC0OYmCj8LW1Izk2IFylXI9DzH6S58HV242fJyc9ZYwY7/pytEN9PLz6aL ogbBmwqgeo2hIehuvVZAYgG9aC9lZkIBrnjOwa/T3cNQWA8Hi67CxiysSD0aA8tGALb1 OVOQ==
Received: by 10.68.223.34 with SMTP id qr2mr9725170pbc.10.1342138150594; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (c-24-5-69-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.69.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ny4sm4775251pbb.57.2012.07.12.17.09.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_97513805-5610-4F2F-B6D4-2239C0EC1385"
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC2485A3.C8C3%charles_honton@intuit.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:09:07 -0700
Message-Id: <AD29164A-87F3-439A-99C8-C434259C7EA7@gmail.com>
References: <CC2485A3.C8C3%charles_honton@intuit.com>
To: "Honton, Charles" <Charles_Honton@intuit.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-v2@tools.ietf.org, "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:08:36 -0000
Charles Thanks for the suggestion. I just did publish a new draft that included a number of items that had been discussed and I would like to get some feedback on your suggestion before incorporating it (or not). Does anyone have feedback on the change below? (+/-) -- Dick On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Honton, Charles wrote: > E. Hammer, D. Recordon, D. Hardt, et.al, > > I'm looking at draft 28 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-28). > > In Section 5.2 the error code should probably include: > > server_error > The authorization server encountered an unexpected > condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. > temporarily_unavailable > The authorization server is currently unable to handle > the request due to a temporary overloading or maintenance > of the server. > > > Regards, > chas >
- [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Antonio Sanso
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mail regarding draft-ietf-oauth-v2 Mike Jones