IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth vs OAuth2 in Authorization header

Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com> Thu, 15 July 2010 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <beaton@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A643A69B6 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.803
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xomPMK5vlNOD for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6B03A68AD for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.84]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o6FHeQGl011133 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1279215626; bh=TB5GAPNr6nq0CBV4ZybNsZHAZ3Q=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=BxXDmI7x004CeX/m93MM/bjbIS47kEIvTEyf+swIyQbbIuFlPceUDREImM4gBemNr gci0TxWKo1I5f7UIGa6xw==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=UGGjICgpfmu8Ryjcbg71YDa5lpokgGXBDbqc688CX//C9wfdDrZSOz1GzLG6TDFNE SXBJeWo8hpeIDH1Zd4kXw==
Received: from pzk6 (pzk6.prod.google.com [10.243.19.134]) by kpbe20.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o6FHePKK020360 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:25 -0700
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so329506pzk.3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.148.10 with SMTP id v10mr23947901wfd.103.1279215617554; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.193.19 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTill8k-fUFt-IZLWdZinScj4fSBoI4rAiAf1PrYR@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTim6az--AdwmEoew2pz3kEjhc_GyEaiyo_0UhSRr@mail.gmail.com> <1279205969.18579.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> <AANLkTildz62l2Me26Dlrv5nNmp8Z3P8JD1K-ChcWc5IO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTill8k-fUFt-IZLWdZinScj4fSBoI4rAiAf1PrYR@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:40:17 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimmFkHqeEIcQulLgUeePudu3N9xdyRCehC4zbAl@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>
To: David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth vs OAuth2 in Authorization header
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:40:20 -0000

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:37 AM, David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought this topic had been beaten to death before.

Can you give me a pointer to the earlier threads?

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status