Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite)
Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Tue, 15 June 2010 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8523A69C3 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.846, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P1AmYVXY287Q for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160DC3A68DF for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.80]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o5FNJ5YF012114 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1276643946; bh=8AStiJwpc44Zfp0mM4Ty9sxalzw=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=C7dPlbnnLC+GZHnHInR9VNEQ8TSDEASXQTJVTy85ouiz2RIPMoqaw5WJ1d+p0s7uB WYoqDPVkIlmrXUigFnrFQ==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=wZVnvn/10ANtUSDqcxaUUhQVOmg2GAnH9662UQOtAdj/TnDgD8JxL2DcA9y3yxpfJ drNVp2ub0AaDuMQ+dxnAQ==
Received: from gwb17 (gwb17.prod.google.com [10.200.2.17]) by kpbe16.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o5FNJ4u2016200 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:05 -0700
Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so4122105gwb.7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.143.19 with SMTP id v19mr6554537ann.125.1276643944150; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.189.37 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EBB66AC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EAF76BC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTin_3ZUINYkl8YJCTbqAQgPM47AqTvjLN81tMtFS@mail.gmail.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EBB66AC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:18:44 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimr934H8K-4n7Xu6GG7M78TsHAtP6q9MSk7JZjl@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:19:03 -0000
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: > Adding a verification code to the user-agent flow was suggested on this list > and received nothing but support. It was suggested as a solution to a > Twitter use case. I think it would be good to see a detailed use case where this is really needed and the previous Web Server and/or User-Agent flows could not do. A Java-Script client can use the Web Server flow to grab a verification code and then either swap it or pass it down to the client server. Marius
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Christian Scholz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Andrew Arnott
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Chuck Mortimore
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Andrew Arnott
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Brian Eaton
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -07 (major rewrite) Eran Hammer-Lahav