IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values

William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> Thu, 18 February 2016 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wdenniss@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049371B335D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQi2WPEvXsMy for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547931B3106 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id jq7so83231898obb.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:40:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=dsulkYimh9owiZcVAdg1kydjHZmVrlDNf0ve4sLBXes=; b=nyjgC4ppAqhRPBWvq7ypp1/+AgrBV7bSHMgnJDQ4p7QMQqEbhoxjapW8VMq3t6ME5M LQsY+C9gQLr8acNew0A/wf7Ew0tj/ASpIKSxOrPA0Nc7OGRKW8ty66jAlPhcgfzFEr35 nJQYfiHx5G10v2tUXuLtkk/auuYR8oDs3t9mS/3eeSUjOJDC+AjVCwMMN2B0sC50tfvR 8iq+8eB0/OrQ7Ic49ZvDD6Oh8D+3uA/2LOMbSNB3M0HmIckRuKT+DupUlyXyJUrmt215 X/wFjsCOXERAiED9BhkFSgG/+Thx67hEAEZ/HlCbazBLXH1BEmEp6hVnTB/iNerON5BN +GjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dsulkYimh9owiZcVAdg1kydjHZmVrlDNf0ve4sLBXes=; b=OZwLMwXbUfgNOa5G2xO9Jdjx2TX3GTCH2R3lCiGEALxbXz+vD8e/nM1Pdpvo2gA+yr X8gKt/3bS1MBf8twTRRm9ZPP9bW+KSoehhW81osmeC4cD42wE185AD5LRP/13n9b+47A 9QrDFJH+gaWkNZpv9g/shoScF0JISMoMACHDRV8ZeRbzfimEI8hYkQD1DKrBHRfOPh0E aRNuJ2WHx4warnmuk50LPQfk7zaQu0yMy658woZ2PIA2zwoSeTMBM0RBOl/jiqsQIwHI ZUbpZ9X/vyOUU3IB5XYXSDPHH1GOYE/zw1+FY2KwTKGTvmk7qD5lmUdI8v6kZyAVVMoY 8H6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORn9FVMKjis1pZemM4Ay0BaujjbjDMyzFZZ9uX1RpfXhiWmzSniKdSLrIuo2kaGmh4EH3Smv38aQbj2K+AK
X-Received: by 10.202.87.208 with SMTP id l199mr7623909oib.97.1455824412250; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:40:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.227.39 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:39:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56C5C273.30406@gmx.net>
References: <56C5C273.30406@gmx.net>
From: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:39:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAP42hCR0TP0+qEvXhix0S+b1C0s1Sp7E6N2nhFh7vHaGrQp_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113de9b8f2dfd3052c1088c9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/OIBQTfGxyfzQcDgQZFX78icgYuk>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:40:34 -0000

+1 to adopt.

My previous concerns of this draft have been addressed, and I am supportive
of having an IANA registry of amr values.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
> adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike
> submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns
> into account. Several working group participants responded positively to
> the new version.
>
> We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
> submitted version -05:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05
>
> Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
> working group.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email