IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?

Ivan Pulleyn <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com> Thu, 15 July 2010 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E2F3A6B65 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBf92pxajole for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804C03A6B36 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywa8 with SMTP id 8so142094ywa.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cJotTSlpjLQ6lBnqQCQC28NH3HA+lCTBtMD3iJQecik=; b=OKsxwsMEZuRo3T+fAtGG1gJTuEJKPW26Jknn61GonLFJuRYJznoMStTDX9ytyjq8m7 7r+B8HmN/wgzO4gXJlpdDJqGnKF/kGKWLQmXWqLJscm/8VCkUZgGcJbh30dBlaHiiVMC NlYXNKP8mmUvJjT5tCCi9jnccQn2w5pMXRc3E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=osmyTYZJ1tmPsctrIVCRq9BzV0ET0+FjxRY5tMqN3wWQksvea1FC7rCrZCn/XEWK3u Y/mQkX+3MHfkuJcpP4/X0dfStNkg3bKRgqU84t+CNTP0Qi8M6iseMZ6+IUFqY3mPNTc7 vQnY6EIrT1FPTGSQz0YbYXIDnZ0QDXRQTimKM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.146.9 with SMTP id t9mr235049ybd.76.1279215228440; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.95.19 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C3F3F6A.5000409@lodderstedt.net>
References: <C8645B85.372D8%eran@hueniverse.com> <4C3F3F6A.5000409@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:33:48 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimspXtynaVoBqRQFp86uohxhhcX4WHLCb6T9M_L@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Pulleyn <ivan.pulleyn@gmail.com>
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd4854e4851b7048b70817d"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:33:57 -0000

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt <
torsten@lodderstedt.net> wrote:

>  As I have written in my reply to Marius's posting. I'm fine with including
> server ids in scopes. But this requires a definition of the scope's syntax
> and semantics in the spec. Otherwise, scope interpretation (and server
> identification) will be deployment specific.
>
>
Yes, I believe the definition of scope implies this.

Ivan...

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status