IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Errata 3904

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6951B2F98 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:14:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9wLeUGqAcx93 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6061B2F96 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:14:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so220658762wmv.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:14:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WOoSqiSXArx0qsI2ChHyhg68BUg4CwrtX5PyjkCta+0=; b=EdZe1ZQ252IvdX/QsNXwWPP9A4t4T3C3Za4rBu1LRX5BhTfcHShlJnXiYrt8Rg7Ned a+Eqof/rB+VaLrG4vJpG2HcaB3HvssDYfTfuQoRfJZdqfooe4dj5chk64CDc1/nMBiQg HgKAQNqxdwZiqxZ2yu8hve8ImxU1cdrwHNKRcZ1XRZ6ZihtPHA3Dw6N6SCf4baEXRCZl OiHI48q7mEvTcRpO8f/kMbWwTxnUkaLdNli29tUlEXN1a0ivcIMdNHKNKL0S2G9tu2eX dPxx5hx/+OrQSI2eHY/Y8b66Yz9cFmti++3FQhG1qW1CwVbxDgotnJ5MeWdYFbn+NCKv bHcw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.179.162 with SMTP id dh2mr372198wjc.17.1449591270391; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.52.130 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:14:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <80D4C2AF-F089-4021-8C33-8FB10CCD83D8@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAHbuEH6P3t_zo3CT-q-Lm3bOffW0_2kTtFvOmKc-W8VFiWDa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <80D4C2AF-F089-4021-8C33-8FB10CCD83D8@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 11:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4dYh-yGVySqbs7RcjBGyqNn8fmM+mbMTQHzQeeOXqfZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Ocl-hy0hgIqdWgm9LquMIRQxKSE>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Errata 3904
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:14:34 -0000

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:07 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
> It is registered in the IANA registry
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml
>
> It is properly specified as a parameter in RFC6749
>
> For some reason in the doc it is not properly listed in the IANA actions.  I would need to go back through the diffs, perhaps it disappeared after the IANA actions and before the RFC editors final draft.
>
> It is a bit strange, however the IANA registry is authoritative, I don’t know that a missing IANA instruction is worth making a big deal over at this point.
>
> If we update the doc we could add that back in, as apparently some people look at that list rather than the registry.

Thanks, John.  I should have looked at the registry!  I'll mark this
as verified and note that it is already in the registry.  I'll put it
down as editorial since the registry is normative.

Thanks!
Kathleen


>
> John B.
>
>> On Dec 8, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm inclined to reject the following errata on 2 counts:
>>
>> error_description is already included int he registry and adding a new
>> entry involves a 'specification required' and a review period on the
>> email list for that registry.
>>
>> Should there be a specification for this?  It looks the same as
>> error_description to me, but maybe I'm missing something?
>>
>> Errata description:
>> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12519.html
>>
>> Section of OAuth 2.0 referenced:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-11.2.2
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kathleen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email