Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signature crypto

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 24 November 2009 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12103A6876 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9YgY6ssw0l5 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043763A67E3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-196.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-196.cisco.com [64.101.72.196]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0612740D12; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:10:33 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4B0C67E8.3070709@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:10:32 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785183009@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343785183009@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080607070800090507080203"
Cc: "OAuth WG \(oauth@ietf.org\)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signature crypto
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:10:41 -0000

On 11/24/09 9:56 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> I think we have consensus that the spec should not mandate a
> particular hash algorithm. This still leave the issue of assigning
> algorithms short names for the purpose of negotiation and
> declaration. Is there a registry available for such algorithms we can
> use or do we need to create a new one?

The IANA maintains a registry here:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/hash-function-text-names

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/