[oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2

"Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> Tue, 10 March 2009 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8775D3A6A5C for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uJeokTz1gadK for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailipao.vtcif.telstra.com.au (mailipao.vtcif.telstra.com.au [202.12.144.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8E3A6917 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webi.vtcif.telstra.com.au (HELO mailbi.vtcif.telstra.com.au) ([202.12.142.19]) by mailipai.vtcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2009 17:13:49 +1100
Received: from mail2.cdn.telstra.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailbi.vtcif.telstra.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CFF1DA83 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:13:49 +1100 (EST)
Received: from WSMSG3701.srv.dir.telstra.com (wsmsg3701.srv.dir.telstra.com [172.49.40.169]) by mail2.cdn.telstra.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757A841D64 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:13:47 +1100 (EST)
Received: from WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.159]) by WSMSG3701.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.169]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:13:48 +1100
From: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:13:47 +1100
Thread-Topic: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2
Thread-Index: AcmhEhfYzVUcOjReTn2UlDmONQfYhwALDYTwAAIZoZA=
Message-ID: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E111F985B512@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723425023C6EEB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723425023C6EEB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [oauth] draft 01: sort order c@ vs c2
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oauth bof discussion <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:13:19 -0000

Why is "c%40" sorted after "c2"?
"c@" sorts after "c2", but §3.3.1.2. "Normalize Request Parameters" encodes names at step 1 before sorting at step 2.

James Manger
James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com
Identity and security team — Chief Technology Office — Telstra

----------
From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:45 PM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-hammer-oauth-01.txt 

	Title           : The OAuth Core Protocol
	Date            : 2009-03-09

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-oauth-01.txt