IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-03.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 07 August 2017 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED19A132643 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wKnuegbHKLVb for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E92EB13263D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v77G9PL4015182; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 17:09:30 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=bNGqGzImWVAijvyiUD3GTgnbzfPRdgL1/hmlHsmRMTo=; b=RT+AJ+r5RMfeDREygOuNCNlpSk7GSbHKdc+M7cV+qnN9oZqa9qkaDgS1X+Hm65ZkB7qn wWIF2pC9zgqAehC/vLwMLyB4C1Sca/M8zoZTCIJdVNO6NAqFMIN+KA5yIejMj46oy7P3 a3cVqUNod/5jC2Z8hSkozbXvHxqAnY7jr6lKnLJw9ziWFkvpSI7rQKwI3alm7VP35Ez5 Ny6OzSTo+vhmPaUZmUYZDh/S2OZJNl0SAuNJaIgUWqN87PEzlXCXmh3vPyV8IA4SK231 CTJ6kcsA50F+BlMPOOwWsOx0LotNzHUSsFAh+gLhRAr/2PAIbXvDwu1jPNSJ/QBOingG Ag==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2c559rukwj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 17:09:29 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v77G32Em026187; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:09:14 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2c59bu7dct-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:09:14 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:09:13 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:09:13 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
CC: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTC2SNRGpjcAji5k6h3+CdDiAo06JxdKYAgANSQgCAABIDAIAAEHAAgARpeoD//8UiIA==
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:09:13 +0000
Message-ID: <ad55b76ba76c4c3ca80aac27b0b1587e@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <150126635076.25225.3854025136006448469@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+k3eCThoxNM394K=it4vCL2k-BW68Lg73eTN=4Z3LrupbXtVw@mail.gmail.com> <b3b27355-11fc-21c9-cfad-f6fb0571ed02@connect2id.com> <CA+k3eCR+YuVivqkUkdc+n4PFfQXPGwztC3PNSZnEe7Tds77xqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCRE9B8M4bAX0m5hY1t9Uvvz292Q5WYmSZjF7h_FkCJTKw@mail.gmail.com> <44d04086-4817-a96b-c060-fb0011dc4ad9@connect2id.com> <7EBDF15A-E2A7-4409-B2E8-01AF37D1C274@ve7jtb.com> <6d150831-ab97-09eb-199c-65eb9e0457c7@connect2id.com>
In-Reply-To: <6d150831-ab97-09eb-199c-65eb9e0457c7@connect2id.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-07_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708070267
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-07_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708070267
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/PL5symRwnl5mf1OHXJVuGU1MqG0>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:09:36 -0000

> A while ago, if I'm not mistaken, I glimpsed some report of vulnerabilities
> caused by incorrect public key comparison.

There was a recent issue raised by Hanno about incorrect public/private key matching leading to incorrect revocation of a certificate; was that what you were thinking of?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email