Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 15 February 2012 23:09 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EFD21F8499 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.958
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPEcQRGXtiuE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FFE21F8476 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1133685ggn.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DSRB3bsLAVQ6+MjHhlJKnpdo7fWUr33Ob8kCoZDTYAM=; b=adu7D7ZmmX0tXC1GUnB7RRq2B5moEp8fA4x4kDn7RBxkXZKsUTRqYFfqgK6FN/Wa7O ulAIePUgeHa54mlKbx+AkgrNe3odHMQtcX5fqGa7crhQ9HLUp6nypKQ1dzfFxQlpER6N GVallpWZ3zWU4QgsipJ/VjPkTUNjZpDEWODiI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.197.33 with SMTP id s21mr187165yhn.40.1329347358190; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.146.136.20 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:09:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723453AADDDA68@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723453AADDDA68@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:09:18 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: njyXl8fopc-s1YHitu_NFZ6VDQo
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAq2bubhhd3i56QKfwq+=h-9Ra-8-F=taYMHy5Sp9jy-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf303f6ad6116b9e04b908cdc7"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:09:25 -0000
Do you have changes to make based on the Apps and TSV Directorate reviews? Barry
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Barry Leiba
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 LC conclusion Eran Hammer