Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-09.txt> (JWT Response for OAuth Token Introspection) to Proposed Standard

[Brian Campbell <[e-mail]>]

+1

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:20 AM Justin Richer <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I would clarify that this doesn’t necessarily say that the user’s there,
> and remove the normative requirement (which doesn’t have enforceable teeth
> in this context):
>
> Implementers should be aware that a token introspection request lets the
> AS know when the client
>     (and potentially the user) is accessing the RS, which *can also
> indicate* when the user is using
>     the client. If this implication is not acceptable, *implementers can
> use other means* to carry
>     access token data, e.g. directly transferring the data needed by the
> RS within the access token.
>
>
>  — Justin
>
> On Aug 27, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt <
> torsten=[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Will the following text work for you?
>
> Implementers should be aware that a token introspection request lets the
> AS know when the client
>     (and potentially the user) is accessing the RS, which is also an
> indication of when the user is using
>     the client. If this impliction is not accepatable, implementars MUST
> use other means to carry
>     access token data, e.g. directly transferring the data needed by the
> RS within the access token.
>
>
> On 26. Aug 2020, at 23:12, Mike Jones <
> Michael.Jones=[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> I agree with Dick’s observation about the privacy implications of using an
> Introspection Endpoint.  That’s why it’s preferable to not use one at all
> and instead directly have the Resource understand the Access Token.  One
> way of doing this is the JWT Access Token spec.  There are plenty of others.
>
> The downsides of using an Introspection Endpoint should be described in
> the Privacy Considerations section.
>
>                                                       -- Mike
>
> From: OAuth <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Dick Hardt
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 9:52 AM
> To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten=[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; oauth <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call:
> <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-09.txt> (JWT Response for
> OAuth Token Introspection) to Proposed Standard
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:37 AM Torsten Lodderstedt <
> torsten=[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> On 25. Aug 2020, at 16:55, Denis <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> The fact that the AS will know exactly when the introspection call has
> been made and thus be able to make sure which client
> has attempted perform an access to that RS and at which instant of time.
> The use of this call allows an AS to track where and when
> its clients have indeed presented an issued access token.
>
>
> That is a fact. I don’t think it is an issue per se. Please explain the
> privacy implications.
>
> As I see it, the privacy implication is that the AS knows when the client
> (and potentially the user) is accessing the RS, which is also an indication
> of when the user is using the client.
>
> I think including this implication would be important to have in a Privacy
> Considerations section.
>
> /Dick
> ᐧ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._