[OAUTH-WG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the document and thanks to Rifaat Shekh-Yusef  for the shepherd
write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended
status.

As a Belgian French-speaking person, I smiled when reading `using fr might be
sufficient in many contexts, rather than fr-CA or fr-FR` :-)

More seriously, should the examples in section 3.1 use a more recent HTTP
version ?

Superb use of SVG in section 5, suggest to introduce the "AS" acronym used in
step 6 in the text below the figure (this comment could possibly apply to other
acronyms).

Finally, I agree with John and Murray about their comments about the IANA
section.